After Trump tweets Defcon hacking video, voting safety consultants name BS

by admin

Getty Photographs

As President Trump continues to make unfounded claims of widespread election fraud, 59 of the world’s foremost consultants on digital voting are hitting again, saying that current allegations of precise voting machine hacking “have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.”

Monday’s letter got here after nearly two weeks of baseless and unfounded claims from Trump and a few of his supporters that this month’s presidential election had been “rigged” in favor of President-elect Joe Biden. On Thursday, Trump began a brand new spherical of disinformation when he took to Twitter to say that polling machines made by Dominion Voting deleted 2.7 million Trump votes across the nation.

Vulnerabilities aren’t exploits

Over the weekend, Trump tweeted a video from final 12 months’s Defcon hacker conference. It confirmed attendees taking part in an occasion referred to as the voting machine hacking village. Organizers of the occasion held it to boost consciousness concerning the significance of safety in digital voting. Among the occasion organizers have been beside themselves that Trump was utilizing the video as innuendo that voting machine hacking performed a job within the outcomes of this month’s election, or in any election ever, for that matter.

“Anybody asserting {that a} US election was ‘rigged’ is making an extraordinary declare, one which should be supported by persuasive and verifiable proof,” the pc scientists wrote. “Merely citing the existence of technical flaws doesn’t set up that an assault occurred, a lot much less that it altered an election end result. It’s merely hypothesis.”

The letter continued:

The presence of safety weaknesses in election infrastructure doesn’t by itself inform us that any election has really been compromised. Technical, bodily, and procedural safeguards complicate the duty of maliciously exploiting election programs, as does monitoring of possible adversaries by regulation enforcement and the intelligence group. Altering an election end result includes greater than merely the existence of a technical vulnerability.

We’re conscious of alarming assertions being made that the 2020 election was “rigged” by exploiting technical vulnerabilities. Nevertheless, in each case of which we’re conscious, these claims both have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent. To our collective data, no credible proof has been put forth that helps a conclusion that the 2020 election end result in any state has been altered via technical compromise.

Monday’s letter follows the issuance of one other strongly worded assertion on Thursday by the Election Infrastructure Authorities Coordinating Council, which incorporates officers from the Division of Homeland Safety’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Safety Company, the US Election Help Fee, and secretaries of state and state election administrators from numerous states.

“The November third election was essentially the most safe in American historical past,” the joint assertion learn. “Proper now, throughout the nation, election officers are reviewing and double checking all the election course of previous to finalizing the consequence.”

The assertion went on to say: “Whereas we all know there are lots of unfounded claims and alternatives for misinformation concerning the means of our elections, we will guarantee you now we have the utmost confidence within the safety and integrity of our elections, and you must too.”

Earlier that day, Reuters reported that Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company Director Christopher Krebs was telling associates he anticipated to be fired. Citing unnamed folks accustomed to the matter, the information outlet stated that Krebs “drew the ire of the Trump White Home over efforts to debunk disinformation” associated to the current elections.

Monday’s letter reveals that laptop scientists are additionally now working to debunk conspiracy theories claiming widespread voter fraud. These signing the doc embrace Matt Blaze, a pc science professor at Georgetown College; Ronald Rivest, a professor on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the R in RSA; Steven M. Bellovin, a pc science professor at Columbia College; Joseph Lorenzo Corridor, senior VP on the nonprofit Web Society; and J. Alex Halderman, a College of Michigan professor of laptop science and engineering who makes a speciality of election safety.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment